Chemtrails & Cognitive Dissonance

An Established Fact ….And A Conspiracy Theory, Both

This topic is a clarion example of cognitive dissonance, with the scientific community openly implementing, discussing, describing and studying the phenomenon that’s plainly been happening over our heads for 25+ years, at a minimum (I recall clearly…

This topic is a clarion example of cognitive dissonance, with the scientific community openly implementing, discussing, describing and studying the phenomenon that’s plainly been happening over our heads for 25+ years, at a minimum (I recall clearly watching crossing trails being laid across the sky above Lake Tahoe while on a ski lift around 1998-99), while news media and the general public deride the whole topic as fantasy. Until lately, anyway.

I will expect that will change now, with the latter two groups about to, beginning now to (though the shared video was posted to YouTube 11 years ago already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEy9aM9g6Jk), switch over to acknowledging and accepting the reality of the trailing, which will, of course, not be accompanied by any admission of its relentless denial until this point (nor will it have any affect on the next thing these same parties aren’t ready to accept), and will be heralded as a fine and needed thing, in any case.

It will be another case of Oceania having ALWAYS been at war with Eurasia, never with Eastasia. It will always have been true and accepted, it will be said.

It’s amazing. Happens over and over again with every major topic. People are completely averse to unsanctioned information, however factual or obvious.

1

About ‘Next Time’ and Reaching People

I received an email this morning from a list I’m on asking for advice from the group about how to best reach people still adhering to the sanctioned c19 narrative (and including this creepy, if clever graphic – not Safeway’s own):

“WARNING! from a cousin of mine
Would Love Your Help!!!
MAY 28

Among my many emails this morning came this WARNINGCovid will still be here this summer. – My internist recommends that I continue to get COVID vaccinations every six months. (Thanks Nurse Dee Dee for the graphic.) When I replied with a list of links, he replied that they must be QAnon Conspiracy Links.

What would you send someone to show the latest developments in a way that they couldn’t simply brush it off as Q conspiracies? Thank you for helping. I think there are still many people in this camp who could use some info that could get a crack in their defensive door?”

About this topic of ‘reaching people’, there are endless reasonable things the cousin (and any people of that mindset) could be shown, were he curious and at all skeptical (and aware) of all that has happened the past 4 years, but his mind is made and closed, he has indicated that clearly, and he is content with his position. I wouldn’t ever spend my time or energy on such people again, and it’s always immediately obvious who they are (and they are most everybody). Not as to persuasion to the alternate position, anyway.

There is, however, another, different position we who seek to see behind the curtain (and who accept that there is a curtain to see behind) could, and will likely need to, adopt with such people when this situation replays next, as it surely will, as Bill Gates has promised it will. An offensive position, no longer a pleading, ‘back on our heels’ defensive stance. The position these people take is one that condoned and approves of force to see it implemented and observed by all, that’s baked into that cake. They are sure they are right, and that the info they consume is entirely correct, and they assume without evidence that the state and the media are not corrupted, which they both fully are, and long have been, maybe always have been.

But, at least about much of what they believed, they were wrong, and the positions they supported caused direct harm, LOTS of it, worldwide, and which is ongoing, and there is no quantifiable value difference between a harm caused by a random pathogen or one caused by human action or social policy. Harm is harm, and they chose to definitively inflict it, cause it. It wasn’t a dice roll. The harm of lockdown was guaranteed. They chose to cause a myriad of harms to possibly avoid another, very minor, and potentially fictitious one. These are super dangerous, thoughtless people who should not be placated or appeased in any way, ever again. 

Such people have to be told bluntly that they erred, that they didn’t know anything certainly (none of us do or can), and do not have any authority to impose their will on others, and were not on the moral high ground. That they were lied to and given both faulty and fraudulent information, and that there was and is another mountain of legit research and anecdotal evidence that supports there being another valid side to the story, one which should at the very least give them pause, preclude ever again such certainty of belief and comfort in exercising sweeping coercion against others. They have to be told to back off, not remonstrated with in perpetuity. Their position is ultimately one of force and violence, and that should be acknowledged and accepted as a baseline anytime such people are engaged with.

We have to accept that some people cannot be reached – and don’t want to be. We can’t be pleading with such people further. That’s a futile waste of time and energy. Occasionally one sees someone with a light in their eyes, and one can spend one’s good energies on them. The rest, next time and from now on, I imagine we’ll have to get pretty hard with. 

1

Time To Accept Certain Things

On the topic of ‘reaching’ people, I think the linked video is probably a reasonably accurate gauge of how likely that is:

The night Osama Bin Laden was killed and Phillies and Mets fans came together as one

ESPN doc on the night that Osama Bin Laden was killed and announced during the Phillies-Mets game on Sunday Night Baseball. The night was May 1, 2011 and the heated rivals and their fans came together to celebrate.

An entire baseball stadium that nearly to a man, apparently (I will assume there were some non-conformists there), unquestioningly believed everything about the official story of 9/11, haven’t the slightest inkling that it didn’t happen that way, nor the slightest inclination to wonder if it did, and would never want to know, anyway. Just want to high-five, pound another brew and feel superior in perfect ignorance. That’s most people (and we all know it).

A repellent piece of propaganda and example of common human nature, I think the liberty and truth communities should take this info under permanent advisement with respect to how to spend one’s time and energy. There are occasional people exhibiting a different demeanor, civility in their tone, a light in their eyes, an open and inquiring mind. Occasional, and enough, is my guess, and those people should be sought out, radars tuned to ID them. The rest can never be reached and do not want to be. A pointless fight that should not be sought or fought unless unavoidable (being trespassed against, which will happen often enough on its own).

Where is Brian Wilkins?

Wilkins v. PayPal, Inc., 23-cv-02931-VKD | Casetext Search + Citator

Read Wilkins v. PayPal, Inc., 23-cv-02931-VKD, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

Like the Ice Age Farmer, another independent journo-blogger, Brian Wilkins, of The Covid Blog, has gone off the radar, making his last posts on his main site and any social media on or around Nov. 17th of ’23, and not responding to comments or messages on his SM, or to email or donation messages (at least to mine) since then.

The most recent outside information I readily found via search engines is about the linked case between him & PayPal, one he apparently lost, and which involves a substantial financial judgement against him.

Perhaps the legalities of this case (possibly under appeal?) prevent him from, or make it wise for him to stop posting, and without notice? It’s pretty odd. Even the IAF made a video post indicating clearly that all was not well in his world before dropping out of view.

If anyone knows anything, please leave a comment, or email me at deadmessenger (at) mailfence (dot) com

UPDATE: Land address & phone number (should anyone want to try either: from https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67502186/parties/wilkins-v-paypal-inc/

Essential Reality

Concise explanation. Most concise I’ve ever heard.

Summary of 1st World Economic Policy

Robert Breedlove. His own background and the origin of original video unknown. How things really work. What he describes is what human beings need to face, far more important and relevant than most all other issues, save a handful.

Longer and more detailed explanation of this dynamic in John Perkin’s book, ‘Confessions of An Economic Hitman’.

This is how and for whom the world works at its most essential, and it would be really helpful if the average person would finally see and accept that reality, so that it might finally change or, better, end.