Property of…

There could hardly be a greater example of not owning oneself or being sovereign over one’s own children than the issue of vaccination, and in Australia they are now ratcheting up the message of just who is the owner and sovereign of the lives on that continent, and in general what the relationship between individuals and their governments is in all like governments worldwide.

The paradoxes are several; one may NOT take one group of drugs (those on the drug war list, some not particularly harmful, some beneficial even), though the entities that forbid the ingestion, possession, cultivation and marketing of these substances have been and are known to have a big hand in the latter two aspects; while one is simultaneously and hugely encouraged to take drugs on a different list (those constantly promoted on commercial television, most of which have long lists of warnings and damaging side effects, and many of which are as addictive or more addictive than the drugs on the first list); and now there is a category of substances that people will be REQUIRED to take into their bodies, per state edict, and which are verifiably known to contain harmful components, like aluminum.

In any case, you definitely don’t own your own body Down Under, and your kids belong to the state. Should be starting to make people really nervous, this sort of thing. I hope that’s the case, or will be soon.

Time to say no. Time to step away.

Australia vaccination; all doctors under the gun; minister of health keeps lying

Australia vaccination: all doctors under the gun: minister of health keeps lying by Jon Rappoport November 25, 2017 Welcome to the Australian state of Victoria, where the minister of health, Jill Hennessy, has just put all doctors under the gun. Vaccinating every child has become so important to Hennessey, she’s declared that a doctor who…

1 Response

  1. Peter Litwin December 23, 2017 / 8:41 pm

    Regarding forced flu vaccinations, this is just one example of an industry colluding with federal governments because of a projected “win-win” outcome – governments get to ratchet down on their agenda to control our very thoughts, and pharmaceutical companies gain massive windfalls when populations are forced by law to consume their products… similar to how our healthcare industry lobbied to pass legislation that forces all citizens to purchase their government-subsidized, parasitical product… It’s all not as mysterious as it might seem once you figure out who stands to benefit from such policies. Meanwhile, our “representatives” whose votes get flipped by the lobbyists with the most money don’t subject themselves or their children to the healthcare system and products they dump onto their constituents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.