Expositive

Is it possible for DT supporters that can correctly see how openly malignant the Left has become to ever recognize the fraud, buffoonery and degrading aspects of DT himself? I think we’ll be getting somewhere should those people ever open their minds to the screamingly obvious.

As is true at all staged events, there are always some deal-breakers that necessarily mean that the event was not authentic, whether pure hoax, partial hoax, or false flag (and real). On 9/11, the main, unavoidable deal-breaker is the collapse of Building 7, which, by itself, necessarily means the event was a false flag. No way around that conclusion.

There were many deal-breakers at DT’s rally event – a cross between partial hoax and false flag – with perhaps the most stark of those being the combination of the lack of blood on his hand at any point after his ear was ‘struck’, neither when he pulled his hand away the first time, nor when he raised his hand while getting shuffled off the stage – his hand is obviously clean throughout – combined with his carnival barker telling of the story at the RNC, which is a brazen and unashamed lie.

It could not be easier to compare his words to the video, and to know, inescapably, that he is lying. There was no blood on his hand or “all over the place”. He didn’t, either, have time to contemplate what the “whizzing sound” might be, conclude that it could only be a bullet, nor was he hit “really, really hard” or he’d have been killed or rendered unconscious. If he was hit by a bullet at all, he was lightly grazed, and there was hardly any ‘blood’ at all as a result. Moreover, his tone is clearly insincere, a blowhard fisherman’s tale of exaggeration, and in which he’s clearly taking some smug satisfaction telling.

How is this not obvious to DT’s supporters? Why the steadfast adherence? He’s definitely lying, yet they still support him, still think he represents a remedy to all the fraud and corruption we forever live with? On what basis? That position cannot be maintained in light of this tall tale alone, which is fraud itself of the highest order.

Beyond that most profound aspect, he’s also not remotely a statesman, using petty insult nicknames for Democrat politicians, like ‘Gavin Newscum’, and thus he reflects horrendously on Americans and American society. He is the epitome of the Ugly American, and his is the personage many people want heading the state? A blustering, lying huckster, at best? It’s astounding.

Moreover, and in general, will it never finally register to these people, most people, that there is an ownership class, to which the major political parties and players are both and all in service, that they are completely captured? If not, then why not? How much proof is needed?

JFK was enough by itself. But then there were three more famous state assassinations in the late 60’s, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, The October Surprise, Iran/Contra, 9/11, the derivatives and real estate finance crisis of ’08, c19, the Nordstream pipeline destruction (a very major event which the U.S. carried out, and promised to beforehand), and along the way since WWII all the overt and covert warring and coups, the many staged events, the endless macro harm done all around the world in our name, environmentally, politically, financially, and societally. It’s a runaway freight train of harm, and Donald Trump is NOT planning to derail it (nor likely could he).

The event in PA would seem to be obviously fraudulent, there’s a strong probability of that, and both camps appear to be its beneficiaries. Trump got his hero framing, and the Dems got the needed catalyst to replace their candidate. My guess is that this was an agreed to event, everybody wins, with the SS Director getting scapegoated for appearance’s sake, as someone had to pay a public price for this, as gross as the security ‘failure’ was.

Whatever the ‘truth’ movement is or might be, it surely hinges on the ability of people to accept verifiable facts, greatest plausibilities, strong probabilities, and likely possibilities, and without attachment or reference to any ideology or bias of prior position.

DT supporters, though they can see the ills of the Left clearly and accurately, and seem to an extent concerned with truth and freedom, are entirely unable to do this, and thus are neither truthers nor libertarians (generically speaking), though many perceive those camps to be one big, happy family. They aren’t.

Most truthers either start out as or become philosophical libertarians as a result of their inquiries, and so the two designations are very much intertwined and overlapping. Trump supporters are neither, nor is their idol. The two camps share a revulsion of the modern Left, and both have occasion to refer to the founders and founding documents of the U.S., and so get lumped together, erroneously, but Donald Trump’s following is fully a cult of personality by now, and the cult always wins, regardless of facts or likelihoods.

Trump’s speech at the RNC about his ‘harrowing moment’ was a spectacular lie. No one actually interested in truth or liberty can avoid that, nor would be inclined to support it once apprised of it.

It’s very simple. Championing DT as an advocate of freedom and truth is delusional, and whatever allows that to happen in the hearts and minds of people fully exposed to the legitimate case against him is precisely the problem in human society at base, in general.

If that ever goes away, or even tilts the other direction, I think that would be a very hopeful marker. In the meantime, what is this devotion and ignorance all about? Are people mostly just thoughtless imbeciles?