News

‘Censorship’

The DM 0 Comments

The word ‘censorship’ is used incorrectly regularly, getting invoked routinely in reference to the interactions of private citizens, often when, say, one private party decides to end an association with another, and in so doing removes that now unwelcome party from their space, whether virtual or physical, which necessarily ends the removed party’s ability to ‘speak’ in that setting, the remover then getting deemed a ‘censor’ by the removed.

That’s not censorship, and isn’t about free speech. That’s an exercise of the rights of association and property. The removed party having no ‘right’ to be in the other’s private space, he was there by the owner’s leave, and the curtailment of his speech in that setting as a byproduct of his removal from that setting, a non-public space, is not a free speech issue, and has nothing to do with the reasons for that aspect of the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Censorship is state restriction of citizen speech. That’s all.

This, however, is censorship, or will be, if and when enacted: https://boingboing.net/2025/09/15/danish-justice-minister-we-must-break-perception-of-right-to-private-messaging.html

This will be the state, whatever state that adopts this, and whatever the justifications offered, proscribing how private conversations may be conducted between private parties. If states can proscribe truly private electronic messaging (if that even exists or even could – which I doubt), and demand to be able to proactively eavesdrop on all electronic messaging in real time or be able to review any of it later, then they can demand to do the same to private verbal or written communications, and by this reasoning, could forbid also the how of those exchanges, as well, whether verbal conversations in unsurveilled settings (say a swept and secured Faraday room in a house or office), or the writing and passing of private unreviewed or unreviewable (by the state) physical documents.

Like an inmate at a prison, one could write a letter, but it will be read and discarded if the content is deemed unacceptable by the warden. In curtailing the how, the state is also thus curtailing the what, the content of what would have been conveyed, but possibly no longer will be, the privacy of the communication being eliminated or the communication just being prevented by the state in the first place.

That rationale is the same, and that’s the state restricting – while also violating, in the U.S., property rights and the 4th Amendment – the speech of private citizens aka: censorship.

1

Rejecting the Tsunami

The DM 0 Comments

Going through just one Telegram thread this morning, a tsunami of evidence for encroaching and enveloping tyranny across the world, the most basic rights people in western nations thought to be unassailable not very long ago rapidly coming to an end, I am reminded of the overwhelming obviousness that we are way, WAY past the point of needing any new information to act, and reminded also that ‘acting’, almost anything and everything that that would entail, is just too daunting and fearsome for people to contemplate doing, so the amassing and sharing of evidence just goes on and on and on….

We are there, at a major societal crossroads, and have been for years, and this is how it always happens, as almost no one can ever handle this crossroads, knows how to proceed once reaching it, the one involving the complete corruption and abuse of one’s own state. Or, more likely, they know, but just can’t face the prospects, and are hoping for a miracle that doesn’t involve major risk and life disruption. I suppose this is what drives support for Donald Trump.

In any case, it’s way too much info and way too many fronts to fight. Too much and too many by orders of magnitude. Those who see this will finally, if anything is EVER to change for the better, or have any chance to, have to simply reject EVERYTHING they have not actively agreed to engage with, support, associate with. Everything. No different than any other private engagement. Non-association as the default and assumed state of being.

I’m pretty sure life isn’t meant to consist of the endless and pointless tracking of super-bad and ominous news while watching all fundamental rights gradually evaporate. If the system worked, then people should have been in jail and executed now for the endless crimes of the state and the private institutions with which the state is enmeshed and owned by. They aren’t, never will be, and we now overtly see the opposite result, with routine citizen dissent and journalism being rapidly criminalized without any due process, and so it comes back hard to the regular person’s doorstep to remedy, to take some action other than endlessly tracking the tsunami.

The only remedy I see, at least the only one that has not been tried, and the one never widely discussed, and the only likely peaceful possibility, is that of the combination of active non-compliance and disassociation.

We will have to move on from this perpetual tracking of the latest, now hourly, waves of corruption, controversy, drama, and hyper-harm we are relentlessly inundated with and agreeing to engage with. Our lives can’t reasonably be thought to be spent properly or happily this way. I believe those who see the problem will have to start tangibly acting in non-compliance and disassociation. How bad is it going to have to get before that might become common thinking? Would it ever, I wonder?

If there’s another way, I’d love to hear it. I don’t see one.

Graham Phillips Journalist

Hello and welcome!

Here is just one gallon I came across today from the 100 foot wall of water bearing down on us all. He’s just the latest of the writers, webloggers and journalists now being criminalized and persecuted in Europe, a practice rapidly going mainstream, even now in England.

1

Where is Brian Wilkins?

The DM 75 Comments
https://casetext.com/case/wilkins-v-paypal-inc

SEPTEMBER, ’24 UPDATE:

Mystery not resolved, possibly illuminated further, but probably only deepened, almost 10 months since his last post on The Covid Blog”.

HS & Shane, in comments below, recently shared news of an obituary for a Brian A. Wilkins, Mesa AZ, died on Christmas Eve, ’23. Obit post on everloved.com created by his ‘uncle’, Stanley: https://everloved.com/life-of/brian-wilkins/timeline/

No memorial date, cause of death, additional bio, photos, or any other info is given. Wilkins is/was from Iowa, but went to college and may have stayed living in AZ since, so that lines up, and the year of birth given, 1975, would seem to be about right.

In light of the super-limited nature of the info with the obit, it doesn’t mean anyone died, it could just be cover and mean the ‘Brian Wilkins’ assignment ended (if he was/is in intelligence). If he did die, though, and was who he portrayed himself to be, then foul play seems likely, as he was not injected, was fairly young, very fit, and someone like him would/should have mentioned he was sick, or so I would’ve thought.

Maybe the ‘uncle’ would respond if contacted: https://everloved.com/members/stanley-wilkins/ Strongly doubt it.

If not, and if the Mesa coroner’s or medical examiner’s or office of vital statistics do not have or will not provide some documentation about this man’s identity and death, then this is a legitimate task for a private investigator to sleuth out at this point, and a very disquieting situation.

ORIGINAL POST (03.15.24, 5:26 PM, UTC+0):

Like the Ice Age Farmer, another independent journo-blogger, Brian Wilkins, of The Covid Blog, has gone off the radar, making his last posts on his main site and any social media on or around Nov. 17th of ’23, and not responding to comments or messages on his SM, or to email or donation messages (at least to mine) since then.

The most recent outside information I readily found via search engines is about the linked case between him & PayPal, one he apparently lost, and which involves a substantial financial judgement against him.

Perhaps the legalities of this case (possibly under appeal?) prevent him from, or make it wise for him to stop posting, and without notice? It’s pretty odd. Even the IAF made a video post indicating clearly that all was not well in his world before dropping out of view.

If anyone knows anything, please leave a comment, or email me at deadmessenger (at) mailfence (dot) com

UPDATE: Land address & phone number (should anyone want to try either: from https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67502186/parties/wilkins-v-paypal-inc/

2

No, It Has Not Always Happened.

The DM 0 Comments

Not at this rate. While it’s possible, of course, that NFL player Hamlin’s recent mid-game cardiac arrest was caused by the blow to his chest on the the preceding play, the incidence of professional athletes collapsing and dying in general (most without sustaining any blow) since the advent of the c19 injections about two years ago is the same as the 38 year span between 1966 and 2004, and half of those earlier deaths happened to athletes with pre-existing heart issues. So, that’s a multiple of between (depending on how many of the athletes since 2021 had pre-existing issues) a 19 to 38x higher incidence of athlete death since the injections started.

That’s just pro athletes. Maybe even more striking is all the children and adolescents dropping, and that effectively has NEVER happened at any noticeable frequency, but always being an exceptionally rare occurrence.

It’s not a coincidence, but a major and obvious correlation, and very likely causal, not Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, nor Happy Heart Syndrome, nor the ‘stress of it all’, and it’s not ‘baffling’. It’s the shots. Pfizer’s own documents list cardiac and clotting issues as expected adverse events, and so they are. They are, at the very least, what has changed, what is new and different, and surely the most plausible explanation of all the deaths of those that should not be dying.

Full paper can be viewed or downloaded as a pdf below.

McCullough-Polykretis-athletesDownload

Another Peek Behind the Curtain

admindmp 0 Comments

Ex CIA Chief Duane McClarridge “We’ll intervene whenever we want to – Get used to it world!”

John Pilger interviews ex CIA Chief Duane McClarridge Segment from the documentary War On Democracy

It’s the viewing of exchanges like this, and there are so many of them now to see, which make it increasingly amazing to me that people continue to care about the public spectacle theatre that happens in front of the curtain, think that it matters, expend energy analyzing and arguing vitriolically about it. Trump v. Biden, for one example. Neither should have become President or even have had the chance to hold the office, and they aren’t in charge, anyway.

The unelected and unaccountable people behind the curtain at the back of the house run the show, the world, and do so at the behest and on behalf of those that own the theatre. What those two entities, the real managers, like Clarridge, and the owners, do matters greatly, and makes hypocrites of us all. At the very least we can definitively say the foreign policy of the United States (of any western nation) has nothing at all to do with making the world ‘safe for democracy’, seeing as how it undermines democratic processes routinely, relentlessly, and by design.

That policy and the entities that carry it out exist to defend, preserve and expand the interests of the ownership class. All discussions not factoring in that and other bedrock, fundamental aspects of human society and governance just enable the continuance of the harm and hypocrisy indefinitely.

This exchange describes how the world really works. One very important aspect, at least. Powerful people and entities do what they want, and make it look like or call it something else, or make it invisible. Should that reality ever get accepted by the majority, and be the thing gets addressed and discussed above all else, then the basis for positive and permanent change in human society will become a genuine potential, but not until then, or so I believe.