Rejecting the Tsunami

Going through just one Telegram thread this morning, a tsunami of evidence for encroaching and enveloping tyranny across the world, the most basic rights people in western nations thought to be unassailable not very long ago rapidly coming to an end, I am reminded of the overwhelming obviousness that we are way, WAY past the point of needing any new information to act, and reminded also that ‘acting’, almost anything and everything that that would entail, is just too daunting and fearsome for people to contemplate doing, so the amassing and sharing of evidence just goes on and on and on….

We are there, at a major societal crossroads, and have been for years, and this is how it always happens, as almost no one can ever handle this crossroads, knows how to proceed once reaching it, the one involving the complete corruption and abuse of one’s own state. Or, more likely, they know, but just can’t face the prospects, and are hoping for a miracle that doesn’t involve major risk and life disruption. I suppose this is what drives support for Donald Trump.

In any case, it’s way too much info and way too many fronts to fight. Too much and too many by orders of magnitude. Those who see this will finally, if anything is EVER to change for the better, or have any chance to, have to simply reject EVERYTHING they have not actively agreed to engage with, support, associate with. Everything. No different than any other private engagement. Non-association as the default and assumed state of being.

I’m pretty sure life isn’t meant to consist of the endless and pointless tracking of super-bad and ominous news while watching all fundamental rights gradually evaporate. If the system worked, then people should have been in jail and executed now for the endless crimes of the state and the private institutions with which the state is enmeshed and owned by. They aren’t, never will be, and we now overtly see the opposite result, with routine citizen dissent and journalism being rapidly criminalized without any due process, and so it comes back hard to the regular person’s doorstep to remedy, to take some action other than endlessly tracking the tsunami.

The only remedy I see, at least the only one that has not been tried, and the one never widely discussed, and the only likely peaceful possibility, is that of the combination of active non-compliance and disassociation.

We will have to move on from this perpetual tracking of the latest, now hourly, waves of corruption, controversy, drama, and hyper-harm we are relentlessly inundated with and agreeing to engage with. Our lives can’t reasonably be thought to be spent properly or happily this way. I believe those who see the problem will have to start tangibly acting in non-compliance and disassociation. How bad is it going to have to get before that might become common thinking? Would it ever, I wonder?

If there’s another way, I’d love to hear it. I don’t see one.

Graham Phillips Journalist

Hello and welcome!

Here is just one gallon I came across today from the 100 foot wall of water bearing down on us all. He’s just the latest of the writers, webloggers and journalists now being criminalized and persecuted in Europe, a practice rapidly going mainstream, even now in England.

Addressing the Conundrum

“There were no laws in Oceania”-just as NO LAWS were broken by Assange (or Alex Jones, or Trump); and there were NO LAWS making us get masked, or stand 6 feet apart, or (worst of all) get “vaccinated”

The targeted are “guilty”-but of what? The government, & “our free press”/Big Tech have SAID they’re “guilty,” so they are; and there were/are NO LAWS that pushed the lethal “COVID measures”

Increasingly now I am aware of, as described in this linked documentary, the staggering amount of time, effort and money perpetually being expended on unsuccessfully fighting off totalitarianism, where collectivism of all stripes always leads. The endless whack-a-mole of that dynamic, how easy it is to completely hijack people’s lives in that never-ending defense, should they choose to engage with such a hopeless and exhausting battle.

It strikes me that the ‘democracy’ model of collectivism is an exceptional one in its ability to create an illusion of participation and control in the minds of those embracing it, offering as it does the theoretical ‘remedies’ and occasional ‘victories’ of court rulings and election results, the theatre of legislative hearings, and the ability to vent and root via one’s media outlet of choice, whether Fox or MSNBC, say, in the U.S. It’s incredibly effective.

All the while ground is constantly lost in the overall. Defeated ballot measures and court rulings can immediately be and perpetually are re-introduced and appealed and overturned, and, almost no one in public service is in any way accountable for their actions, ever bears any risk for their actions. Anyone attempting to engage with that for very long is likely to be exhausted fairly quickly, and to very little effect.

So, disengagement with and rejection of this paradigm and the tsunami of distractions and encroachments upon natural rights would seem the only way forward. How best to do that, I wonder (and above all else at this point)?

No Good Deed Goes Unpermitted

So….this shouldn’t even be remotely possible, but it is, and it’s routine, and no one is really surprised when it happens, and everyone shrugs their shoulders because….there is nothing anyone can do about it. So far. Not in this paradigm, and certainly not in the moment, while the food truck is getting the heave ho, being shown the door, and exactly when it is most needed. Again we have the servant government’s petty and voluminous rules trumping reason and the very real and far more relevant and pressing needs of the people dealing with catastrophe.

After the fact, people can complain and call or write their councilmen/aldermen, start a petition, try to get such and such regulation or code overturned, but who has time for that, and who should have to make time for that (likely unending and futile) task? The moment has passed, anyway, and another like it will not likely arrive soon, so very few people will want expend their energy that way after the fact. Nor should anyone ever have to. The people being given or buying the food can make their own assessments about the risks entailed. It’s none of the state’s concern.

Again, the servant is master (always is, since that servant status is entirely theoretical), and it is because the current (and ancient) paradigm says there is no option but to associate with the entity (the state).

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/food-truck-forced-town-permit/

The Basic Problem

An apt example of the basic dynamic of collectivism. The “owner” owns nothing. The entity that one can not disassociate from, nor have any practical control over, the state, acting as a proxy for “the group”, effectively owns all the houses within its jurisdiction. A warned occupant in this case must both fix any “violation” AND apply for permissions and pay their costs in order to do so, and which will likely be followed by citations in a matter of time if not fixed in the preferred time frame, and must also pay for the agents who are grossly misusing their time issuing the warnings.

No sane persons would ever direct their servant government to apply itself thus in this time frame, within hours of a hurricane’s passing, but this is what must inevitably be the result of the existence of a relationship which may not be opted out of. The servant is become the master, and must unavoidably become so, and there likely is no reform I can see save the ending of compulsory participation in “the group”. The DM

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/help-fl-residents-repair-homes-faster-officials-threaten-tickets-code-violations/